My Myers-Briggs Rant

I'm just about to whack one of the sacred cows ofextroverted when the situation calls for it, so whatever
the HR world, the Meyers-Briggs Type Inventoryelse it is, the MBTI isn't a predictor of behavior.
(MBTI) test, so if you're a big fan of the MBTI youOkay, if that were all of my objections I would just
might want to quit now, or read on and flame me insneer at it as a badly designed psychometric
the comments.I'll summarize the MBTI by saying that it'sinstrument and forget about it. But the world in general,
a personality inventory test based on Jung's theory ofand industry in particular, has siezed on the MBTI as
opposites. It assumes that there are four importantthe key to personality and compatibility. So I have
components of a personality and that each is binary:personally seen:
either you are and introvert (I) or an extrovert (E). ThisQualified candidates not hired because "they have the
means that the MBTI can assign you to one of sixteenwrong personality profile for the job."
personality types, based on your answers. The MBTIPeople denied promotions because "their personality
cult asserts that this personality type is very significantwouldn't fit the executive team."
for who you can work well with, what jobs you'rePeople moved from software development projects
suited for, who you should marry, and most other lifeto software quality assurance (testing and bug fixing)
decisions. You can read more about it here and here.Isbecause "their personalities are more suited to that
it clear to you that this is nonsense? Here are mykind of work."
observations:I'm not laying these outrages at the feet of the MBTI,
it's idiot managers and HR staff who are to blame for
Jung's theory of opposites was a psychoanalyticmisusing it. But the structure of the MBTI is so simple
theory meant to diagnose and treat psychopathologies,that it seems irresistable to assign people to
not to categorize healthy people. And even within itspigeonholes from which they can never escape
realm, it's now regarded only as a metaphor, not as abecause, presumeably, their personality type is fixed.So
reliable personality model.personally, I recommend that you stop using the MBTI
As far as I know, the MBTI has never been validatedand that we burn all copies of it, but I know I've got a
to show that it actually measures what it claims tobig chip on my shoulder. If you feel you have to rely on
measure. Its correlations against other, more robustit, you should at least combine it with another, better
personality measurements are very weak.validated, instrument like the Strong Inventory, or use it
The questions of the MBTI yield a continuoussimply as a starting point for discussion and don't take
quantitative value, but you are assigned to oneit seriously as a personality measure, or combine it with
category or another of a scale based on a seeminglyyour intuitive appraisal of someone's personality.But for
arbitrary cutoff value. So, for instance, my score onheaven's sake, don't stamp a person's MBTI score on
the thinking/feeling scale is so close to the cutoff thathis or her forehead and let it determine the trajectory
I'm assigned to different categories depending on howof their career.Okay, I'm done with the rant and you
I'm feeling when I take the test.can start throwing sticks and stones if you want.
I've seen plenty of introverts who can be quite